Observation frameworks

Every report is aligned with an observation framework. ClariLens currently supports the Danielson Framework for Teaching and T-TESS, and can add other frameworks or adapted versions of existing ones on request.

Your school’s framework

On a team, the framework is set for the whole school when it joins ClariLens, so every report and every chart uses the same one. To change it, contact ClariLens. Free trial users can try every framework.

Domains and rubrics

A framework groups rubrics into domains. Reports and ratings are organized the same way. You choose which rubrics a report covers on the report page.

Rating scales

Each framework defines its own rating scale: the rating labels, their numeric values and, optionally, weighted scores. ClariLens uses that scale for ratings, scores and charts.

In the Danielson framework, ratings in ClariLens look like this:

  1. 0Ineffective

    The practice is missing or works against learning.

  2. 1Developing

    The practice is present but inconsistent or only partly effective.

  3. 2Effective

    The practice is solid and consistent.

  4. 3Highly Effective

    Exceptional practice, with students taking on much of the work themselves.

A rubric without evidence in the notes is marked N/E and isn’t counted. See Reading the ratings table.

Danielson rubrics

Filter by domain or type a word to find a rubric.

Descriptions are short summaries, not the framework’s rubric text. Rubrics marked “Seen in the lesson” are the ones a classroom visit usually gives evidence for; the others mostly come from plans and conversations.

T-TESS

T-TESS, the Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System, works the same way in ClariLens, with its own domains, rubrics and rating scale.